• Announcements

    • KSI worstplayer

      Division, Area Section, and Shoutbox Rules   09/11/2017

      Division and Area Section Rules.
    • KSI BadKitty 7

      2019 Divisional Cup Kickoff!   04/01/2019

      Hello, Friends!  As most of you know from last year, Divisional Cup will keep track of divisional participation throughout the year. Starting at Spring Break and ending with January's Award Show, we will be ranking divisions each month by their participation in activities, growth, and officer staff ratio to develop a competition for Division of the Year! The division with the most points at the end of each month will be named Division of the Month. As you can see on the chart above, a list of monthly events will be posted with the meeting notes and in the Div Cup area on the forums, so everyone can be aware of what will count toward points! Divisions can expect to see points counted for Weekend Warfare, Montage and Clip submissions, News Team contests, Twitch Subscriptions, Social Media activity,  and OTM/DOTM award periods in the AAP..  plus a couple of other categories weaving in and out throughout the months! Additional events will be added depending on what is happening in and around KSI for that particular month. Same as last year: KSI's large events -- Spring Break, Spirit Week, Fall Classic, and Turkey Bowl -- will count independently and figure into the overall scores, but not the monthly tallies. Different from last year: (Change is good, promise) This year Div Cup will be split into two halves. This means even if your Division doesn't start off too hot in the first half, you can always give them a good kick in the rear at the start of the second half, and finish off strong! Here is an example of how it will look, along with the standings so far. I'm sure you all remember that Divine Warrior's took home the win last year.. so as of right now, they are the Division to beat! I'm looking forward to seeing the activity and participation from all of you!    Side note: I took down the names of all the people who supported #billdabear. I'm coming for you.        
Sign in to follow this  
Scarface 77

How Would You Handle it?

What would you do?  

4 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you handle the situation?

    • No Physical Evidence to support John story and the only witness has possible bias so I stress that they need to cut it out and move on
      4
    • I remove Joe for violating his 1 strike policy and my evidence is John testimony and Mike's witnessing the event combined with his history
      0
    • Other - Please Explain
      0


2 posts in this topic

So here is the scenario and please choose whichever option is more along what you as an officer/leader would handle it or offer an alternative route:

 

KSI John23 came to me today complaining that Joe32snipe  violated code of conduct in some of the verbal statements directed towards him (*KSI John23*).  The statements did consist of a few vulgar terms , which can easily be identified as racist and definitely not something you would want to hear. The only other person in the party is KSI Mike23 who is john brother and is backing up the entire statement.  Joe32snipe professes that he did trash talk a little bit because they were playing some overwatch and he was carrying the team but said it wasn't one sided. KSI John23 was also throwing verbal shots back in defense and joe took it as healthy trashtalk amongst friends. When approached about the racist comments made , Joe says that he didn't say it (Side note- Joe has a history of speaking without thinking and his words have gotten him in trouble in the past and is currently on a 1 strike). As an officer how would you handle the scenario? *Vote via poll and post explanation below*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards

This is a very tough situation. If you don't remove Joe than the other two could get upset and decide to leave and they may feel ignored, but to decide Joe is guilty without any actual evidence or non biased witnesses would be unjust and unfair.

I think the most fair and just action would to not punish Joe.

But how you present this information to John and his brother will determine how they will react. You need to explain that you're not able to punish Joe due to no evidence or non biased witnesses, explain why his brother is a biased witness, but apologise for them feeling the way they do and that Joe is on a one strike policy and if there were evidence of wrong doing by him he would be removed.

You would explain to Joe that this is another chance to show he will be a valuable member.

If John and history brother decide to leave even after this it isn't your fault, you're just doing the just and fair action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this