• Announcements

    • KSI worstplayer

      Division, Area Section, and Shoutbox Rules   09/11/2017

      Division and Area Section Rules.
    • impyyy

      KSI Divisional Hall of Fame   08/12/2018

      We are excited to announce a new addition to KSI's portfolio -- The Divisional Hall of Fame! Members make impressions and differences every day at the divisional level, and thanks to the ingenuity of KSI member KSI Skarzx 77 and the KSI AAP, we have decided to implement an official Divisional Hall of Fame across the community. The process will run similarly to KSI’s “Of the Month” and “Of the Year” awards, but with some minor tweaks, including the nomination periods and the nomination process. Current Members This process will happen twice a year: 1) at Fall Classic in September and 2) Spring Break in March. You will only be allowed to nominate one (1) person in YOUR division. You cannot nominate a member of another division, or if you are not active within Clan-Ops. To be eligible, the nominee must meet the following baseline criteria: Must currently be in the division they are being nominated for. Must be in the division for at least six (6) months. Must be in KSI for at least one (1) year. Must have been awarded Outstanding Service Level 1 through the AAP. Not been blacklisted, security risked, or DNH’ed unless successfully appealed and overturned. Must have KSI gamertag. Please make sure those criteria are met. You can confirm that criteria by visiting their profile and looking at their awards tab, or by asking the person you are nominating. The nomination process will occur within a specially made section similar to KSI's DOTMs, and each division will have its own thread for nominations. Each nomination will earn your division a point for the Divisional Cup for September. When the nomination process ends, AAP will confer and select up to three (3) inductees per division. They may choose less depending on testimony and evidence provided. Previous OTM/OTY/Award nominations will be considered when going over nominations. The inductees who are selected will be announced at a KSI-wide Live Stream on the Final Day of Fall Classic in late September and Spring Break in late March. Some tweaks may occur before the nominations open, but here is the template you will be provided to use: --- Information on Nominee: Division:
      Gamertag:
      Link to Profile: Qualifications: Nominee’s Current Rank:
      Has Nominee been in this division for at least six (6) months?
      Has Nominee been in KSI for at least one (1) year? Awards: Has Nominee been awarded Outstanding Service Level 1?
      Please list other awards this member has received: Testimony: Why does this member belong in your division’s Hall of Fame? --- Retired/Ex-Divisional Members Retired Members may be able to be inducted throughout the year by applying in the AAP section. They will submit a normal AAP post following the usual award template, and witnesses will be outlined in the form. The same process will be used for Directors/Seniors/Etc. who are still in the community, but not currently within the division they made their ascent in. If the strength of the witnesses is to par, they will be inducted on the spot following an AAP vote. Current Hall of Fame Members Current KSI Hall of Famers will be retroactively inducted into their division's Hall of Fame. Display of Divisional Hall of Famers Divisional Hall of Famers will be displayed for eternity within the Clan Ops Information Center, with blurbs from the testimony provided during the nomination process. Becoming a Divisional Hall of Fame inductee is no minor accomplishment and we will proudly display their gamertags for future generations of KSI members to look at as an example of what a great KSI member is. --- So that's the system, and we will be moving forward with this process. We will review the process periodically to see if there will be new tweaks to make it run more efficiently. The first nomination period will be from August 20 - September 15, with winners announced during Fall Classic. Thank you for your support and happy nominating. - KSI ImPyyy 7
      KSI Chief Executive Officer
Sign in to follow this  
Scarface 77

How Would You Handle it?

What would you do?  

4 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you handle the situation?

    • No Physical Evidence to support John story and the only witness has possible bias so I stress that they need to cut it out and move on
      4
    • I remove Joe for violating his 1 strike policy and my evidence is John testimony and Mike's witnessing the event combined with his history
      0
    • Other - Please Explain
      0


2 posts in this topic

So here is the scenario and please choose whichever option is more along what you as an officer/leader would handle it or offer an alternative route:

 

KSI John23 came to me today complaining that Joe32snipe  violated code of conduct in some of the verbal statements directed towards him (*KSI John23*).  The statements did consist of a few vulgar terms , which can easily be identified as racist and definitely not something you would want to hear. The only other person in the party is KSI Mike23 who is john brother and is backing up the entire statement.  Joe32snipe professes that he did trash talk a little bit because they were playing some overwatch and he was carrying the team but said it wasn't one sided. KSI John23 was also throwing verbal shots back in defense and joe took it as healthy trashtalk amongst friends. When approached about the racist comments made , Joe says that he didn't say it (Side note- Joe has a history of speaking without thinking and his words have gotten him in trouble in the past and is currently on a 1 strike). As an officer how would you handle the scenario? *Vote via poll and post explanation below*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards

This is a very tough situation. If you don't remove Joe than the other two could get upset and decide to leave and they may feel ignored, but to decide Joe is guilty without any actual evidence or non biased witnesses would be unjust and unfair.

I think the most fair and just action would to not punish Joe.

But how you present this information to John and his brother will determine how they will react. You need to explain that you're not able to punish Joe due to no evidence or non biased witnesses, explain why his brother is a biased witness, but apologise for them feeling the way they do and that Joe is on a one strike policy and if there were evidence of wrong doing by him he would be removed.

You would explain to Joe that this is another chance to show he will be a valuable member.

If John and history brother decide to leave even after this it isn't your fault, you're just doing the just and fair action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this